Killing for Love and the Doctored Audiotapes, Part 2

This post is a return to Killing for Love for further examination of the way in which audio recordings from the 1986 police interviews in London were dishonestly manipulated. Part 1 showed how sections of Jens Soering's interviews were, variously, cut, distorted and reconstituted – that is, doctored – so as to misrepresent what was … Continue reading Killing for Love and the Doctored Audiotapes, Part 2

Betrachtungen: ein Gastbeitrag von Elizabeth Haysom

Hinweis: Elizabeth Haysoms Äußerungen wurden vor der Ankündigung ihrer Freilassung durch den Bewährungsausschuss von Virginia verfasst. Eine Mitteilung für die Deutschsprachigen Zu der Zeit, als diese Webseite zum ersten Mal erschien, fanden sich auf dieser deutsche Besucher in etwa genauso häufig wie Amerikaner ein, und überholten sie schließlich mit großem Abstand. Ich hätte nie erwartet, … Continue reading Betrachtungen: ein Gastbeitrag von Elizabeth Haysom

Reflections: A Guest Post by Elizabeth Haysom

Note: Elizabeth Haysom's statement was written before the announcement of her release by the Virginia Parole Board. Introduction As I have observed before, many people were the victims of Jens Soering's relentless campaign of lies and defamation, but none more so than Elizabeth Haysom. There was no untruth about her too sordid for him to … Continue reading Reflections: A Guest Post by Elizabeth Haysom

Jens Soering’s Rejection of Legal Advice

One of Jens Soering's most frequent allegations is that he was denied access to a lawyer when being held for questioning in London. This is a recurring theme of his story and represents a significant aspect of his extensive catalogue of lies, the allegation to be found scattered throughout his writing and interviews. To repeat … Continue reading Jens Soering’s Rejection of Legal Advice